Editorial update: · Richter Immobilien-Transaktionen
A redecoration clause is useful only when it fits both the property and the rest of the tenancy agreement. This guide helps landlords distinguish valid ongoing duties from problematic standard terms and prepare a realistic plan for the next letting.
Planning to let a property in Düsseldorf or NRW? Discuss your letting
Start with the legal allocation of responsibility
When preparing a new tenancy, it is tempting to reuse a familiar contract and leave its redecoration section untouched. Perhaps the previous tenant never challenged it. That history does not establish that the clause is enforceable. For a landlord, the useful question is what work the incoming tenant can validly be required to undertake and how that affects future maintenance planning. This guide concerns German residential tenancy law, including properties in Düsseldorf and the rest of North Rhine-Westphalia. It does not apply English or other foreign tenancy rules.
The starting point is section 535 of the German Civil Code, the BGB. The landlord must provide and maintain the property in a condition suitable for its agreed use. Certain decorative maintenance duties may be transferred to the tenant within legal limits. Without an effective transfer, the landlord should not budget on the assumption that a tenant will pay for the next repainting. Section 538 BGB separately provides that tenants are not responsible for deterioration caused by use consistent with the tenancy.
The German term Schönheitsreparaturen means decorative maintenance rather than repairs to everything that looks worn. Typical examples include painting walls, ceilings, radiators and interior doors, wallpapering, and painting windows on their inside surfaces. Fixing a leaking pipe or replacing a defective radiator involves a different issue.
Make an initial distinction between worn decoration, a technical defect and possible tenant-caused damage. Each needs its own assessment. A broad request to “put everything right” can conceal different legal responsibilities and make an otherwise manageable handover dispute harder to resolve.
Review all the documents together
A carefully worded clause about actual need may be undermined by an appendix requiring complete redecoration whenever the tenant leaves. Read the main agreement, supplementary terms and intended handover documents as one package. Highlight every provision dealing with renovation, return condition, timing, execution and contributions to costs. Our guide to the tenancy agreement places that exercise within the wider preparation for a letting.
Standard contractual terms are subject to controls including section 307 BGB. They must not disadvantage the other party unfairly and must be sufficiently clear. Under section 305 BGB, the distinction between standard terms and an individual agreement does not depend on typography or whether a provision appears on a separate sheet. What matters for an individually negotiated provision is that its substance was actually negotiated in detail.
A landlord therefore cannot reliably turn a standard obligation into an individual agreement simply by handwriting it or adding a second signature box. A declaration that everything was negotiated is not a substitute for the actual process. If a particular property requires an unusual arrangement, a German lawyer practising residential tenancy law should examine both the wording and how the parties reached it.
Also keep the work itself within the correct category. In case VIII ZR 210/08, the Federal Court of Justice, or BGH, explained why extending a standard decorative-repairs obligation to exterior painting of doors and windows could invalidate the transfer as a whole. Adding more tasks does not necessarily improve the landlord's protection. A limited and coherent obligation is more useful than an ambitious list that cannot be enforced.
Establish the condition at the start of the tenancy
A dwelling does not necessarily have to be freshly painted immediately before every letting to count as renovated. The overall impression matters. Insignificant traces of use may be disregarded, while a flat need not be completely worn out to qualify as unrenovated or in need of redecoration. The BGH explains the distinction in VIII ZR 185/14, decided on 18 March 2015.
Where a dwelling is handed over unrenovated or needing redecoration without adequate compensation, a standard term transferring ongoing decorative repairs to the tenant is ineffective. Flexible intervals do not cure that problem. Otherwise, the incoming tenant could become responsible for removing the previous occupant's wear. A general statement that the property is accepted as viewed does not settle whether compensation is sufficient.
The compensation must place the tenant in a position equivalent to having received renovated accommodation. There is no universal amount or number of rent-free days that works for every property. In VIII ZR 185/14, half a month's rent did not adequately compensate for the particular painting work required in three rooms. That does not establish that half a month's rent is always insufficient or that a full month is always enough.
Record the relevant rooms, surfaces and visible wear, together with any compensation actually granted. If you arrange work yourself before handover, keep its specification and photographs of the completed result. An invoice confirms that work was billed; it does not, on its own, show the condition of every room when the tenant moved in. Connect the evidence to the actual handover date and the dwelling concerned.
Make actual need central to the timing
A rigid timetable requires redecoration solely because a stated period has elapsed. That can oblige a tenant to paint rooms which remain in good decorative condition. The BGH rejected such a standard arrangement in VIII ZR 361/03. A genuinely flexible approach must allow later work when the property's condition justifies it.
Intervals found in old contract templates are not statutory deadlines. At most, an appropriate schedule can provide guidance. Read the complete wording to determine whether the actual state of the decoration governs the obligation. A term such as “normally” cannot be treated as a certificate of validity if another sentence requires the work by an absolute deadline regardless of condition.
Consider two flats last decorated at the same time. One still has sound, clean wall finishes. The other has substantially worn decorative surfaces. Their tenants may have occupied them for identical periods, yet a condition-based assessment can produce different results. Within a single flat, a frequently used kitchen may also need attention before a rarely occupied guest room. Calendar arithmetic does not establish the same need in every room.
For a practical assessment, note which surfaces are affected, what the deterioration consists of and when they were last decorated. Take account of evidence of work carried out by the tenant during the tenancy. A claimed need for inspection does not authorise entering without agreement; arrange any necessary visit appropriately. This produces a factual basis for discussing the obligation and makes it easier to identify the specific points on which the parties disagree.
Avoid automatic final redecoration and percentage payments
Offering freshly decorated accommodation to the next tenant may make commercial sense. It does not automatically give the landlord a corresponding claim against the departing tenant. A standard clause requiring final redecoration regardless of condition or the date of the last work is ineffective. In VIII ZR 316/06, the BGH confirmed this even where the final obligation stood alone and the tenant had no ongoing decorating duty.
For example, a tenant may redecorate properly during the tenancy and move out shortly afterwards. If the finishes remain in good condition, leaving the property does not make them need another coat of paint. Conversely, the end of a tenancy does not simply erase duties that have already fallen due under a valid agreement. The correct assessment connects the effective obligation with the actual need, rather than treating departure itself as the trigger for new work.
Standard percentage-payment clauses, known as Quotenabgeltungsklauseln, are not a dependable alternative. They require a contribution towards decorative work that is not yet due, often by reference to the period of occupation. The BGH rejected these standard clauses in VIII ZR 242/13. A contractor's quotation used as a calculation base does not by itself make the percentage arrangement permissible.
An actually negotiated individual agreement requires a separate assessment. Do not mistake that distinction for permission to relabel a predetermined form. For routine letting preparation, it is more productive to keep ongoing responsibilities coherent and retain a realistic maintenance budget than to rely on a complex payment formula whose enforceability is doubtful.
Resolve existing disagreements using the right evidence
If a tenant disputes a request to paint, first assemble the whole contract, the incoming inspection record, photographs and relevant correspondence. Compare them with the current condition and the precise work requested. Is the disagreement about the validity of the clause, the initial condition, the present need or the quality of work already done? Each question requires different evidence. Combining everything into a single demand can obscure the point that actually needs resolving.
Where a standard transfer is ineffective, the statutory allocation generally takes its place under section 306 BGB, while the remaining tenancy agreement normally continues. However, that does not mean that every tenant who accepted an unrenovated flat can immediately demand a complete refurbishment at the landlord's sole expense. The agreed initial condition still matters to the maintenance obligation.
In VIII ZR 163/18, decided on 8 July 2020, the BGH addressed a significant later deterioration in decoration. Under the circumstances described, the tenant could seek redecoration while contributing appropriately, generally half of the necessary costs, because the result improved on the agreed initial condition. This is not a universal rule requiring every decorating bill or handover expense to be split equally.
Possible damage also needs separate treatment. An ineffective redecoration clause does not automatically remove liability for culpable damage, while an ordinary sign of use does not automatically establish a damages claim. Obtain legal advice on the basis of any claim and any required request or deadline before charging the tenant. Section 548 BGB generally gives landlords six months from recovery of the property for claims arising from changes or deterioration; have the relevant start date and preservation of claims checked promptly in a dispute.
Budget for the next letting using amounts you can rely on
Separate legally supportable claims against the outgoing tenant from improvements you want for the next letting. A different colour scheme, a more durable finish or a consistent appearance for marketing photographs may be worthwhile. Their usefulness to your letting strategy does not determine who is legally required to pay for them. Keeping the categories distinct also improves the quality of quotations from contractors.
Take a purely illustrative budget of €2,400 for decorative work and €600 for other preparation, making €3,000 in total. Until a tenant's liability is established, your cash planning should allow for that sum as a possible landlord expense. These figures are neither current market prices nor an assessment of recoverable costs. Ask contractors to separate the work clearly so that maintenance, optional improvements and potentially attributable damage can be considered independently.
Allow time between return of the property, inspection, necessary work and the promised start of the new tenancy. Signing a new agreement with a fixed commencement date does not settle a dispute with the previous occupant. Leaving the decorating question until the last moment can create avoidable pressure between two tenancies. Early discussion of visible condition helps with planning, although it cannot resolve contested legal obligations by itself.
Connect your preparation with a realistic assessment of the rent. Spending on decoration does not automatically justify any rent you wish to charge. The guide to finding suitable tenants helps with the next stage once the condition, proposed offer and timetable are sufficiently clear to support reliable statements to applicants.
Use a clear sequence before the next signature
Start by establishing the actual condition in which the property will be handed over. Decide the intended allocation of responsibilities, then check whether the selected agreement reflects it clearly and consistently. This sequence is more useful than choosing a demanding clause first and trying to make the property fit it afterwards. It also lets you resolve questions before applicants rely on a promised standard of accommodation.
Before signing, answer five practical questions. Which decorative tasks are covered? What evidence establishes the initial condition? Does actual need remain decisive for timing? Do any appendices add renovation or payment duties? What costs and time will you allow if an expected tenant contribution does not materialise? Record unresolved points and deal with them before making binding commitments about the handover condition or availability date.
Give any reviewing lawyer the entire set of documents. An isolated paragraph without the handover circumstances can be misleading. A German residential tenancy lawyer is the appropriate professional for a disputed clause, a special compensation arrangement or a concrete damages claim. Preparing and marketing a letting is a separate task, and the two can be coordinated so that commercial decisions rest on a realistic legal and practical foundation.
If you are preparing to let a property in Düsseldorf or elsewhere in NRW, use the landlord enquiry form for RICHTER Immobilien-Transaktionen to describe its current condition, your intended start date and the organisational questions still open. Those details provide a useful starting point for discussing the letting. Clear contractual responsibilities, an accurate description and a workable timetable support a well-prepared transition to the next tenancy.
